SYDNEY (Australia): Indigenous leaders from the Torres Strait Islands have lost a significant legal battle against the Australian government over its handling of climate change, marking a setback for climate justice and Indigenous rights. The Federal Court ruled that the government is not legally obliged to protect Torres Strait Islanders from the impacts of climate change, dismissing a case that had drawn attention both nationally and internationally.
The case, brought by two Torres Strait Islander elders, argued that successive federal governments breached a duty of care by failing to set emissions reduction targets and adaptation measures consistent with protecting their low-lying island homelands. The plaintiffs sought a court order to force deeper emissions cuts and government action to prevent their communities from becoming “climate refugees.” The Torres Strait Islands, a group of more than 200 small islands between Australia’s northern tip and Papua New Guinea, are among the regions most vulnerable to rising sea levels and climate impacts. The plaintiffs highlighted that some islands are just over a meter above sea level, making them particularly susceptible to flooding, saltwater intrusion, and erosion that threaten homes, gravesites, freshwater supplies and cultural sites.
In handing down his judgment, Federal Court Justice Michael Wigney acknowledged the severe threat of climate change to the islanders and criticized past emissions targets for not aligning with the best available science. However, he found that under current Australian law the government does not owe an enforceable legal duty of care regarding climate change impacts. The judge said decisions on climate policy, including setting emissions targets and adaptation planning, are matters for parliament and public policy rather than judicial enforcement.
The ruling rejected arguments that the government’s climate action, or lack thereof, should be judged under negligence law and that losses of cultural connection and harm to traditional ways of life could be compensated. The court noted that Australian common law does not currently recognize cultural loss or climate impacts as a category of actionable damage in this context.
The Torres Strait Islanders’ legal action began four years ago, with hearings including an on-island visit by the court to Boigu and Saibai, where community members testified about the impacts of climate change on their land and culture. Their lawyers based the case on successful climate litigation overseas and had hoped it could establish a precedent similar to landmark Indigenous rights rulings that recognized Aboriginal land rights.
The plaintiffs expressed profound disappointment after the ruling. They said they were in shock did not know how to explain the decision the community. However, they pledged to continue their fight, which means they could appeal the decision. The appeal could challenge the Federal Court’s interpretation of legal duties and expand legal avenues for climate accountability.
Climate experts and advocates said the case highlighted limitations in Australian legal frameworks for addressing climate change harms, especially for vulnerable communities. They argue that courts have been reluctant to expand existing law to encompass climate obligations, leaving litigants to seek change through legislative and policy avenues. The government, represented by climate and Indigenous affairs ministers, reiterated its ongoing commitment to emissions reduction and adaptation planning, emphasising national climate risk assessments and adaptation strategies currently under development.
The outcome has intensified discussions on how best to safeguard coastal and Indigenous communities from climate change, underlining the urgency of international and domestic climate action while exposing gaps in legal protections for populations on the front lines of environmental change.
Click here to follow our WhatsApp channel and get instant updates
